Guinea's Great Game

Written by Benjamin Wishart

Edited by Camilo Pallasco-Prophette

Resource nationalism, Sino-American rivalry and the limits of sovereign statecraft between resource curse and resource imperialism

---

Guinea-Conakry presents one of the starkest paradoxes in African political economy. It sits atop some vastly valuable resource endowments: the world's largest bauxite reserves, and the highest-grade untapped iron ore in the Simandou mountains - and yet it remains tethered to the bottom of every major development index, with a poverty rate of 43.7% and an electrification rate of 51.1% (World Bank 2025). The gap between resource endowment and developmental outcome is contested as a "resource-curse" brought about by poor governance, colonial extraction, post-independence rent-seeking, and a commodity order structured to capture value far from the place of extraction. Colonel Doumbouya, who seized power in a coup in September 2021, is attempting to rewrite this paradox. His junta is pursuing an assertive form of resource nationalism - revoking licences, demanding downstream value addition, and extracting equity stakes from foreign partners - at a moment when Sino-American rivalry over critical minerals has granted commodity-rich states a chance to gun for development.

Resource Curses

Guinea's insertion into the world economy followed the characteristic logic of colonial extraction, as resources were developed for export in their least-processed form, with value addition externalised. Independence from France did not fundamentally alter this structure. Successive governments - civilian and military alike - captured resource rents through patronage networks rather than reinvestment, and foreign mining firms effectively operated outside the domestic economy (Cobain and Hirsch 2025).  

This is what political economists have termed the "resource curse" - the paradox by which resource abundance correlates with weaker institutions, lower growth, and greater inequality than comparable resource-poor states (Stevens et al. 2015). Commodity dependence crowds out manufacturing; resource rents sustain authoritarian governments by reducing the need for broad-based taxation; and the volatility of commodity prices transmits external shocks directly into fiscal instability. Doumbouya's statecraft is now testing whether state agency, exercised through licence revocation and mandatory local processing requirements, can disrupt these structural dynamics.

A gambit to discipline Foreign Capital with a new Resource Nationalism

Resource-endowed governments, emboldened by demand for the resources required for the energy transition, have wielded export restrictions and domestic processing requirements in a turn to more protectionist industrial policy (Bloomberg 2026). Guinea's nationalist turn is motivated in that raw bauxite sells for roughly $65 per tonne and processed aluminium fetches upwards of $450 (Bloomberg 2026). Processing, which has largely taken place in the industrial economies of Guinea's trading partners, not in Conakry, therefore subsidises the industrial base of wealthier countries.

This turn to resource nationalism was first seen in Guinea’s seizure of assets belonging to the Guinea Alumina Corporation (GAC), a subsidiary of Emirates Global Aluminium (EGA), the United Arab Emirates state-backed conglomerate (Hodgson and Pilling 2025). GAC had operated in Guinea for years, shipping raw bauxite without breaking ground on the domestic aluminium refinery its licence required. Doumbouya's government revoked the permit and transferred the concession to the state-owned Nimba Mining Company. EGA's parent holding company, Axis International, responded by launching a $29bn arbitration case before the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes - a sum exceeding Guinea's annual GDP - alleging that equipment had been seized and bank accounts frozen (Reuters 2025).

Critics argue that demanding downstream processing in a country with a 51.1% electrification rate places the ‘cart before the horse’, as refineries require considerable and constant energy supply and logistics networks that Guinea does not yet possess (IMF 2025). This could change, as reported in Bloomberg (2025), China's State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC) will start construction of a 1.2 million-tonne-per-year bauxite refinery which the junta hopes will help the country shield itself from commodity price swings. Alongside this SPIC are developing a 250MW power plant and supplying 100MW to the national grid. Guinea's total installed generating capacity stands at approximately 990 MW, most of it unreliable and unevenly distributed. The country's hydropower potential is estimated at over 6,000 MW, among the highest in West Africa, and despite their hydropower plants at Kaleta and Souapiti supporting regional energy security exporting 1,174 GWh annually to Senegal, The Gambia, and Guinea-Bissau, it remains severely underdeveloped.

Simandou and the Chinese monopsony

While the bauxite dispute has attracted regional attention, the more consequential transformation has been unfolding in the Simandou mountains. As reported in the Economist (2025), the deposit - 2.4 billion tonnes of iron ore grading at 65% purity, the richest untapped reserve in the world - made its first commercial shipment to China in January 2026, after nearly three decades of corruption scandals, corporate litigation, and two coups. The infrastructure investment is staggering - a $20bn project encompassing a 622-kilometre railway through mountainous terrain and thick jungle, and a new deepwater port at Morebaya.  

Chinese state-owned enterprises hold roughly 75% of the overall project. Rio Tinto, an Anglo-Australian miner, which first secured exploration rights in 1997, has been reduced to a 25% stake. Doumbouya's government holds a 15% stake in both the Rio Tinto southern block and the Chinese northern block of the mine and the associated infrastructure - an equity position extracted through reportedly aggressive negotiations (Pilling and Hook 2025) Alongside this, the government has announced the Simandou 2040 National Development Plan - a $200bn plan to channel mining rents into a structural transformation of the Guinean economy. The development plan is anchored by a new sovereign wealth fund - the Fonds de Richesse Simandou – which has carved out investments in education, energy, and infrastructure. Standard and Poor’s (2025) decision to award Guinea its first sovereign credit rating - at B+ - reflects the market's judgement that Doumbouya's approach is, at minimum, coherent enough to price.

The structural tensions embedded in the Chinese partnership merits careful attention. Worries are already growing in the locality regarding the fifty thousand Guineans who worked on construction many of whom received salaries for the first time, the operational mine only requires fifteen thousand employees given its capital intensity. Chinese contractors built the entirety of the northern block infrastructure, funded on contracts reportedly worth ¥220bn (Caixin 2025ii). Chinese state-owned outlets are keen to report that the primary motive behind this was to diversify Chinese iron ore supply aware from the Australian Pilbara, and to secure ore-prices for their own processing (Caixin 2025i). Most market commentators expect iron ore prices to fall from roughly $100 per tonne to $70 over the next two years - a depression caused, in part, by what Simandou itself will add to markets (Matthew and Holden 2025). Chinese state firms, led by Baowu Steel, are simultaneously the dominant investors, the builders of the export infrastructure, and the dominant buyers of Simandou's output. Indeed, suppressing the commodity price serves their interests irrespective of Guinea's own revenue projections. The railway runs to Morebaya port and from there to Chinese steel mills - not to a domestic processing facility.

This is not necessarily Chinese malevolence, but rather it reflects the rational behaviour of state firms pursuing national industrial interests. It does raise the question of whether Guinea risks trading other forms of corporate extractivism for a Chinese monopsony, in which the buyer owns the infrastructure, sets pricing, and drafts the contracts that govern both.

The Liberty Corridor and the new great game

Approximately 160 kilometres from Simandou, in the Nimba mountains, lies a deposit that has become an interesting front in Sino-American contest over African minerals. Kon Kweni, owned by Ivanhoe Atlantic, holds iron ore at 66.5% purity. Its management have stated publicly that "every tonne we produce is reserved exclusively for American and allied supply chains" and that "none will go to China". Rather than routing ore through Guinea's Chinese-built Trans-Guinean railway to Morebaya, Ivanhoe Atlantic has endorsed the development of a ‘Liberty Corridor’ - a rail line running through neighbouring Liberia, joining an existing ArcelorMittal line, and bypassing Guinea's infrastructure entirely. From Conakry's perspective, this is harder to accept (Pilling and Hook 2025ii). The corridor would eliminate Guinea's logistical leverage entirely - routing ore through Liberian infrastructure and marginalising the railway investment around which the Simandou 2040 plan is built. From Guinea's vantage this looks a lot like resource imperialism. The junta has changed its position on the 2019 agreement permitting Liberian export routing; a senior politician told the Financial Times that the option is now simply "not an option." (Pilling and Hook 2025ii).

In many ways this is part of a closing of the philosophical gap between Chinese and American economic statecraft, playing out in both capital markets and in geo-economic strategies of development finance.  Rio Tinto, which holds Simandou’s southern block, itself has a substantial minority equity stake held by Chinese state-owned firms. Aluminium Corporation of China, Chinalco, holds 14.55% of RioTinto London listed shares. Additionally, in a letter from Representative Moolenaar, chair of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, he expressed concerns about Ivanhoe Atlantic – the owner of the Nimba project – and its sister company Ivanhoe Mines, of which 33% is held by CITIC Metals and Zijin Mining (China Select Committee 2025).

Moreover, America is increasingly wielding its state apparatus and its Development Finance Corporation to throw its weight around resources and infrastructure transactions, which looks to be prompted by China’s own development financing of infrastructure. Much the same has happened in Balochistan, where America’s International Development Finance Corporation has backed Barrick Gold's position at the Reko Diq copper deposit countering the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and its anchor at Gwadar port, just 70 miles down the coast (Russell and Jilani 2025). In both cases, American development finance is being deployed not on market logic but on geopolitical logic - acquiring partners and developing infrastructure according to alliances and resources competition, rather than comparative advantage. The economic co-dependencies within Sino-American geopolitical interests advances a view of an uncomfortable hegemonic contest where each superpower is bound together by capital networks they are trying to undo. For states caught in the middle of this, as with Guinea, they must contend with hedging across the blocs and attempting to play them off one another to achieve developmental outcomes over what would have otherwise been willingly available.

Taken together, Guinea's "resource scramble" deserves attention as it is a constellation of competing extractive logics: Chinese state-capitalism, America's new geo-strategic doctrine, Gulf sovereign wealth, and a junta attempting to manage itself, and all three. Guineans have the most at stake and it would be surprising if any of these competing powers subordinated their interests to Guinea's own wishes to compel the country towards development.

Bibliography:

Bridge, G. (2008). Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn009

Bloomberg (2025) Chinese firm to build Guinea’s biggest alumina processing plant. Available at:  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-02/chinese-firm-to-build-guinea-s-biggest-alumina-processing-plant?embedded-checkout=true)

Bloomberg (2026) Zimbabwe’s Export Ban Jolts the Lithium Market. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2026-03-05/next-africa-zimbabwe-s-export-ban-jolts-lithium-market 

Bloomberg (2026) Guinea eyes stricter bauxite supply rules to arrest price slump. Available at:  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-16/guinea-eyes-stricter-bauxite-supply-rules-to-arrest-price-slump?embedded-checkout=true

Caixin – Guoping, L. (2025, December 3). Simandou iron ore mine ships first cargo to China. Caixin Global. https://www.caixinglobal.com/2025-12-03/simandou-iron-ore-mine-ships-first-cargo-to-china-102389356.html 

Caixin Global – Luo, G., Bao, Z., and Jia, D. (2025, November 17). How Chinese expertise opened up Simandou, a $20 billion West African mine redrawing the global iron ore supply map. Caixin Global. https://www.caixinglobal.com/2025-11-17/cover-story-how-chinese-expertise-opened-up-simandou-a-20-billion-west-african-mine-redrawing-the-global-iron-ore-supply-map-102383563.html

House China Select Committee (2025) – Available at: https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/scc-letter-to-secretary-rubio-on-ivanhoe_120925.pdf

Cameron, P.D. and Stanley, M.C. (2017) Oil, Gas, and Mining: A Sourcebook for Understanding the Extractive Industries. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/222451496911224999

Dobbs, R., Oppenheim, J., Thompson, F., Brinkman, M. and Zornes, M. (2013) Reverse the Curse: Maximizing the Potential of Resource-Driven Economies. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/energy_resources_materials/reverse_the_curse_maximizing_the_potential_of_resource_driven_economies

Hodgson, C. and Pilling, D. (2025) 'Guinea's second-largest bauxite producer launches $29bn arbitration case against the government', Financial Times [online]. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/3ef783f3-87f3-4910-a678-9f7210eef94f

International Monetary Fund (2024) Guinea: 2024 Article IV Consultation and Request for Disbursement under the Rapid Credit Facility. Washington, DC: IMF Country Report. Available at: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2024/english/1ginea2024001.pdf

Matthews, J. and Holden, J. (2025) 'Simandou iron ore project: A game changer for global supply', S&P Global Market Intelligence, 4 September. Available at: https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/09/simandou-iron-ore-project-a-game-changer-for-global-supply

Pilling, D. and Hook, L. (2025i) 'How the world's biggest mining project is a win for China', Financial Times [online]. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/9fe8f588-5383-4fde-b2f7-11fcbb206384

Pilling, D. and Hook, L. (2025ii) ‘The American company seeking to counter China in Africa', Financial Times [online]. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/4f344f2d-11a1-4acd-bfce-98028a43aa3f

Pilling, D. and Hook, L. (2026) ‘The new era of resource imperialism’, Financial Times [online]. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/7be42ea6-0cbd-487b-a437-e92635bc0e0f

Standard and Poor Ratings (2025) Republic of Guinea Assigned 'B+/B' Sovereign Ratings; Outlook Stable [online]. Available at: https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3443580

Stevens, P., Kooroshy, J., Lahn, G. and Lee, B. (2013) Conflict and Coexistence in the Extractive Industries. London: Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/field/field_document/chr_coc1113exec.pdf

Stevens, P., Lahn, G. and Kooroshy, J. (2015) The Resource Curse Revisited. London: Chatham House, Energy, Environment and Resources. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/20150804ResourceCurseRevisitedStevensLahnKooroshyFinal.pdf

Sguazzin, A. and Clowes, W. (2026) 'Trump's Africa minerals push faces long road to match dominant China', Bloomberg, 7 March. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2026-03-07/trump-s-africa-minerals-push-faces-long-road-to-match-dominant-china

The Economist (2025) 'A giant iron-ore mine could bring Guinea riches or ruin', The Economist, 7 December. Available at: https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2025/12/07/a-giant-iron-ore-mine-could-bring-guinea-riches-or-ruin

Veltmeyer, H and, Petras, J. (2014). The new extractivism: A post-neoliberal development model or imperialism of the twenty-first century? Zed Books.

Warnecke-Berger, H., and Ickler, T. (2025). The political economy of extractivism: Natural resource rents, inequality, and challenges ahead. [Book / manuscript, details as per original reference].

WorldBank (2025) - https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS?locations=GN and https://pip.worldbank.org/country-profiles/GIN 

Reuters (2025) - Axis International seeks 289 billion over revoked bauxite permit - https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/axis-international-seeks-289-billion-guinea-over-revoked-bauxite-permit-2025-12-29/ 

Russel and Giliani (2024) Pakistan courts US with pitch for new Arabian Sea port Financial Times [online] Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/9f7c7bf2-76ed-4eb6-bb9a-f628d05b0068?syn-25a6b1a6=1